








<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Iris UsersZ-wave in general, Hackable? &#8211; Iris Users</title>
		<atom:link href="https://irisusers.com/forums/topic/z-wave-in-general-hackable/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>https://irisusers.com/forums/topic/z-wave-in-general-hackable/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.5.8-5815</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>https://irisusers.com/forums/topic/z-wave-in-general-hackable/#post-515</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Z-wave in general, Hackable?]]></title>
					<link>https://irisusers.com/forums/topic/z-wave-in-general-hackable/#post-515</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Darth Vader</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I learn by just throwing things out into the ether, so here it goes here. Security of the home automation and security network has always been a concern but it is growing as the market expands.</p>
<p>I have heard issues of a hub (z-wave) being forced into secondary mode. The reason given is that the communication on the z-wave is so active that it will force the hub into secondary controller mode. I have only heard one manufacturers hub doing this so I believe it is something in the &#8220;backend&#8221; of the manufacturers software and they are attempting to push blame onto the z-wave spec/system itself.</p>
<p>My concern is if this is true, this being a z-wave issue then ALL systems using z-wave might be open to attact.</p>
<p>Thoughts? Ideas? Suggestions?  </p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

